Federico Gaio vs Matthew Ebden Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
L L L W W L L L L LHead To Head: Gaio 1 - 0 Ebden
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gaio winning 2 and Ebden winning 1. The last match between Gaio and Ebden was at the U.S. Open - New York, 24-08-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Federico Gaio getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Gaio | 1 |
| Matthew Ebden | 0 |
U.S. Open - New York(24-08-2021)
6
4
3
6
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Matthew Ebden
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:52:0 | Average Match Time | 1:52:0 |
| 55% (48/87) | 1st Serve % | 54% (40/74) |
| 69% (33/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (29/40) |
| 59% (23/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (16/34) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 39% (29/74) | Return Points Win % | 36% (31/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Federico Gaio
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gabriele Bosio
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
88%
(
53 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gianluca Carlini
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Gaio
44%
(
40 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Filippo Romano
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alessandro Dragoni
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Ebden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Matthew Ebden
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Matthew Ebden
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Matthew Ebden
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Matthew Ebden
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Matthew Ebden
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
13
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Zizou Bergs
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Stefan Kozlov
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Matthew Ebden
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Matthew Ebden
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Matthew Ebden
59%
(
83 of
141)
1st Serve %
65%
(
93 of
142)
4
Aces
23
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
67 of
93)
48%
(
28 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
58 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
58 of
142)
141
Total Points Won
142
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (526/439) | Win/Loss | 56% (478/380) |
| 53% (1205/1068) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1107/929) |
| 51% (11068/10593) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9986/9273) |
| 55% (136/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (304/242) |
| 57% (334/256) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (17/39) |
| 45% (51/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (61/47) |
| 36% (5/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (96/52) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 3004 | Aces Total | 3323 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2390 | Total Double Faults | 2341 |
| 1:9:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 556.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 549.41 |
| 58% (27135/47153) | 1st Serve % | 62% (26157/42216) |
| 71% (19324/27135) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18932/26157) |
| 51% (10139/20018) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7732/16059) |
| 39% (1750/4458) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1573/3777) |
| 38% (18415/48497) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15750/41634) |
| 32% (12/26) | Slam W/L | 39% (27/42) |
| 23% (3/10) | Masters W/L | 43% (26/35) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 40% (21/31) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (110/113) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (270/257) | Challenger W/L | 64% (204/115) |
| 66% (220/115) | Futures W/L | 60% (106/71) |
| 54% (515/949) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (459/806) |
| 67% (6/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (15/42) |
| 46% (141/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (150/295) |
| 54% (183/340) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (142/270) |
| 85% (511/435) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (481/398) |
| 15% (511/76) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (481/83) |
| 20% (454/90) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (377/79) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
